Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 06:08
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
S&P Dow Jones Makes No Changes to S&P 500 in Quarterly Rebalance - Bloomberg
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Cosmic Dawn with Nobel Laureate John Mather - NASA (.gov)
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What makes outside showers appealing? Why are they not commonly seen?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Do you wear tights for warmth or to make your legs look better?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What is your favourite summer outfit? Why?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Popular Processed Foods Linked to Early Signs of Parkinson’s Disease - SciTechDaily
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.